Narrative: Difference between revisions
Dsi.ionescu (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
|||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
Narrative Therapy is collaborative, non-pathologising and strongly influenced by the work of [[Michel Foucault]], [[Gregory Bateson]] and [[Jerome Bruner]]. | Narrative Therapy is collaborative, non-pathologising and strongly influenced by the work of [[Michel Foucault]], [[Gregory Bateson]] and [[Jerome Bruner]]. | ||
---- | ---- | ||
Latest revision as of 23:07, 26 September 2026
Narrative
Overview
Narrative Therapy is a poststructural and social constructionist approach developed principally by Michael White and David Epston during the 1980s.
Rather than locating problems within individuals, Narrative Therapy understands identity as being constructed through stories, relationships, language and culture.
Therapy focuses on helping people separate themselves from problems, recognise overlooked experiences and develop preferred stories that better reflect their values, intentions and relationships.
Narrative Therapy is collaborative, non-pathologising and strongly influenced by the work of Michel Foucault, Gregory Bateson and Jerome Bruner.
Central assumptions
This project grows through feedback
This wiki develops the way systemic ideas do — through feedback and circularity, not a fixed final version. If this page helped, confused, or fell short, that's worth knowing. Give feedback →
Narrative Therapy assumes that:
- identity is socially constructed
- people live through stories
- problems are separate from people
- language shapes reality
- knowledge and power are interconnected
- culture influences identity
- people continually resist problems
- preferred stories already exist within lived experience
Theory of change
In Narrative Therapy, change happens through re-authoring — a shift from a dominant, problem-saturated story to a preferred story, built from previously unnoticed unique outcomes and made durable through rich, connected description and an audience who witnesses and helps sustain it.
The therapist does not supply the new story. They ask questions that separate the person from the problem, notice moments the dominant story cannot account for, and help those moments develop into a fuller, thicker alternative — one the person recognises as truer to their own values and intentions than the story that brought them to therapy.
Change may happen through:
- externalising, which separates the problem from identity and frees the person to examine and resist it
- unique outcomes, which supply the raw material a dominant story has no room for
- thickening the plot, which makes a preferred story vivid, connected across time, and durable enough to survive future challenges
- outsider witnessing and therapeutic documents, which extend the new story into social and relational life rather than leaving it as private insight
- deconstructing dominant discourses, which reveals a problem's power as historically and culturally produced rather than natural, personal or permanent
- re-membering, which revises a person's relationship with significant others, living or dead, in ways that support the preferred story
This links strongly with:
- Re-authoring
- Externalising
- Unique outcomes
- Thickening the plot
- Outsider witness practice
- Dominant discourse
- Preferred story
- Re-membering
Foundations
The school integrates ideas from:
- Poststructural philosophy
- Social constructionism
- Systems theory
- Anthropology
- Literary theory
Knowledge structure
Foundational Concepts
Core Concepts
- Unique outcomes
- Alternative story
- Narrative identity
- Identity conclusions
- Thickening the plot
- Absent but implicit
- Resistance
- Dominant discourse
- Cultural narratives
- Subjugated knowledge
- Re-membering
- Narrative documents
Wider Narrative concepts
- Double listening
- Language games
- Life scripts
- Meaning-making
- Positioning
- Relationship stories
- Stories lived vs stories told
- Therapist transparency
Narrative Methods
Meeting people and externalising the problem
- Meeting the person away from the problem
- Externalising conversation
- Experience-near naming
- Problem naming (technique-level entry: see Techniques)
- Problem-saturated story exploration
- Dominant story exploration
- Problem influence mapping
- Person influence mapping
- Position map
- Problem deconstruction
- Deconstruction
Developing alternative and preferred stories
- Unique outcome development
- Alternative story development
- Preferred story development
- Re-authoring conversations
- Landscape of action and identity mapping
- Scaffolding conversations
- Absent but implicit exploration
- Double listening practice
- Values exploration
- Identity story exploration
- Re-membering conversation
Documentation, witnessing and community
- Narrative letter writing
- Therapeutic documents
- Outsider witness practice
- Definitional ceremony
- Reflecting team in narrative contexts
- Collective story development
- Community of concern practice
Wider narrative practice
- Internalised other interviewing
- Narrative practice with children
- Narrative therapist positioning
- Aftercare and maintaining gains
Narrative Techniques
Externalising and mapping
- Externalising questions
- Externalising metaphors
- Experience-near naming questions
- Problem naming
- Mapping the influence of the problem questions
- Mapping the influence of the person questions
- Mapping the effects questions
- Problem influence mapping questions
- Problem deconstruction questions
Statement of position and evaluation
Unique outcomes and re-authoring
- Unique outcome questions
- Unexpected outcome questions
- Sparkling moment questions
- Counter-story questions
- Alternative story questions
- Preferred story questions
- Re-authoring questions
- Landscape of action questions
- Landscape of meaning questions
- Thickening questions
- Absent but implicit questions
- Values questions
- Intentional state questions
- Internal state questions
- Future action questions
Scaffolding and distance
Witnessing, documents and therapist style
- Witnessing questions
- Witnessing reflections
- Therapeutic letter
- Certificates
- Documents of resistance
- Internalised other questions
- Narrative questions for children
- Situated comments
- Tentative reflecting comments
- Transparency statements
- Permission questions
Therapeutic aims
Narrative Therapy seeks to help people:
- separate themselves from problems
- recognise their responses to adversity
- reconnect with personal values
- develop preferred identities
- strengthen meaningful relationships
- challenge oppressive discourses
- create richer stories for the future
Major contributors
- Michael White
- David Epston
- Michel Foucault
- Jerome Bruner
- Barbara Myerhoff
- Gregory Bateson
- Jill Freedman
- Gene Combs
- Gerald Monk
- John Winslade
Related epistemologies
- Narrative epistemology
- Social constructionism
- Poststructuralist epistemology
- Postmodern epistemology
- Systemic epistemology
Critique and contemporary use
Narrative Therapy has been highly influential across systemic and community practice, but it also requires careful, reflexive use.
Possible critiques include:
- externalising, used too individually, can underestimate material constraints such as poverty, racism, violence or institutional power that a story alone cannot re-author away
- the therapist's own influence in helping co-author a "preferred" story can be underacknowledged, presenting a jointly-made account as though it were simply discovered
- the strongly verbal, language-based approach can be less accessible for some people and contexts unless deliberately adapted
- outsider witnessing requires careful facilitation, or the audience's response can inadvertently centre itself over the person whose story is being witnessed
- an emphasis on preferred stories can tip into a celebratory tone that avoids difficult, unresolved or genuinely painful material
Contemporary Narrative practice is strongest when it is combined with:
- Power and culture pathway
- Reflexive practice pathway
- Trauma-informed epistemology
- Anti-oppressive epistemology
- Decolonial epistemology
Narrative ideas should support careful, ethical and collaborative practice, not replace attention to material conditions, safety or accountability.
Related pathways
Version status
Version 2.0 — rebuilt as a complete inventory in the shared school-page frame, following the Milan model: full concept, method and technique inventories, Theory of change and Critique and contemporary use sections in place.
Give feedback on this page: [SystemicWiki Feedback Form](https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScrBMoa6DxSrVKz8yJSHonEA7jK_Ho0CIWqgH2ppkRN7omVjA/viewform?usp=publish-editor)
Review status
Status: Open for review
Review history:
(No reviews yet.)